Mauch v. Pittsburgh Pension Board
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Me. Justice Aenold,
Plaintiff appeals from the judgment of the court below disallowing interest on pension payments found due him in án amicable action of mandamus.
The agreed facts in the action are: Plaintiff had been an employe of the City of Pittsburgh from Jan: uary 2, 1901 until the city terminated his employment on January 15,1925. From the effective date of the Act of 1915, P.L. 596, 53 PS §9411, which established the pension fund for city employes administered by de fendant, until March 26, 1939, he made all payments into the Fund as required. On June 25, 1925, and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hickey v. Pittsburgh Pension BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Carbondale City School District v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of MarylandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Philadelphia v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- Nagle Engine & Boiler Works v. ErieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Miller v. ReadingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission v. Sanders & Thomas, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Banish v. City of HamtramckMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
- Wade v. S. J. Groves & Sons Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Murray Hill Estates, Inc v. BastinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- City of Milwaukee v. Firemen Relief Ass'n of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.