Legal Opinion

Couy v. Nardei Enterprises

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 13, 1991No. 1168PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DEL SOLE, Judge:

In this case we are asked to determine if counsel fees should be awarded to Appellees, plaintiffs in the trial court, under the common fund doctrine, codified in subdivision 8 of 42 Pa.C.S. § 2503. We affirm the trial court and hold that Appellees are entitled to counsel fees from the common fund created as a result of common law arbitration.

The underlying dispute in this case concerns Appellees, who are limited partners, and Appellant, John Nardei, the managing partner of Nardei Enterprises. Appellees submitted a claim to common law arbitration charging that John Nardei had…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Hempstead v. Meadville Theological SchoolSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  3. Jones v. MuirSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Estate of WanamakerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Pennsylvania Ass'n of State Mental Hospital Physicians v. State Employees' Retirement BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. PETOW v. WarehimeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. Steer Ex Rel. K & K Cable, Inc. v. EgglestonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
  3. Committee of Creditors Holding Unsecured Claims v. Sable, Makoroff & Gusky, P.C. (In re Second Pennsylvania Real Estate Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Royce v. Michael R. Needle, P.C.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2019
  5. In re Estate of Stover, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API