Legal Opinion
Denbow v. Borough of Leetsdale
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided August 20, 1997PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DOYLE, Judge.
Polce Officers Ronald Denbow, Vernon Krayniewski and Andrew Pszenny, and the Polce Wage and Poley Committee (colee-tively, the Polce) appeal from an order entered in the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County that dismissed their motion for judgment n.o.v. For the folowing reasons, we affirm.
The record reveals the folowing undisputed facts. On December 30, 1991, the Borough of Leetsdale (Borough) and the Polce Wage and Poley Committee entered into a three-year colective bargaining agreement (the CBA) which provided for the terms and conditions of employment for the Borough…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Retirement Board v. McGovernSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- McKinley v. Luzerne Township School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Francis v. Neville TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Township of Tinicum v. FifeCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- City of Reading v. FeltmanCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
3Cited by2 opinions
- Denbow v. Borough of LeetsdaleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Subaru of America, Inc. v. State Board of Vehicle Manufacturers, Dealers & SalespersonsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004