Legal Opinion

Jones v. Muir

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 25, 1986No. 38 M.D. Appeal Dkt. 1985PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McDERMOTT, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order of the Commonwealth Court awarding counsel fees and expenses to the law firm which represented appellee, Carol Jones, in a suit commenced by her in Commonwealth Court. The subject of the suit involved the establishment of the Catastrophic Loss Trust Fund (CAT Fund).

*537On February 12, 1984, the General Assembly enacted the Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law.1 In part the Act established the CAT Fund, which was designed to provide certain benefits to Commonwealth residents for medical treatment and rehabilitative services for…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Hall v. ColeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. In re Fine Paper Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
  5. Hempstead v. Meadville Theological SchoolSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Dover Historical Society, Inc. v. City of Dover Planning CommissionSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
  2. PETOW v. WarehimeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  3. In Re Nomination Petition of FarneseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  4. State Board of Tax Commissioners v. Town of St. JohnIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Society Created to Reduce Urban Blight v. Zoning Board of Adjustment of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API