Legal Opinion

Carlo Bianchi & Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided January 14, 1959No. 466-54PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MaddeN, Judge,

delivered tbe opinion of tbe court:

The plaintiff claims that in performing a contract with the Corps of Engineers of the War Department, it encountered changed conditions within the scope of Article 4 of its contract which caused it to incur extra expense for which the Government should have paid but did not.

The contract was made in July 1946. The plaintiff was to build an earthen dam across Canacadea Creek at Almond, Steuben County, New York. One item of the work was the blasting through rock of a tunnel some 710 feet long. The blasted area was to be approximately 17 feet in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Volentine and Littleton v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956
  2. F. H. McGraw & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1949

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. River Construction Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
  2. Perini Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
  3. Utah Construction & Mining Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
  4. H. L. Yoh Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1961
  5. Carlo Bianchi & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API