Carlo Bianchi & Co. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam :
In the court’s opinion of January 14, 1959 (144 Ct. Cl. 500), it was decided that the plaintiff was entitled to an equitable adjustment for the cost of installing permanent supports in the tunnel, and the case was remanded to the Trial Commissioner pursuant to Rule 38(c) to determine the amount.
The Trial Commissioner has now reported that Items 2 through 7, both inclusive, and Item 16 were reasonably related to the cost of installing the tunnel supports and the damages for the delay incident thereto and as a result of the disruption to the balance of the contract work. The court…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Carlo Bianchi & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1959
3Cited by4 opinions
- L. L. Hall Construction Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
- Utah Construction & Mining Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
- Utah Construction and Mining Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- Utah Construction and Mining Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965