Legal Opinion
H. L. Yoh Co. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided April 7, 1961No. 435-55PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLaramore, Judge
Plaintiff sues to recover the difference in dollars between the overhead rate as fixed in a “time and material” contract and the overhead rate actually encountered during performance thereof.
On June 15, 1952, plaintiff and defendant entered into a time and material contract for the changing and conversion of drawings and parts lists maintained by defendant at its Detroit Arsenal on automotive equipment. A time and material contract was entered into because the number of drawings and parts lists involved were not ascertained, nor could an accurate estimate be made except at a prohibitive cost.
*106A…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Volentine and Littleton v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956
- Loftis v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1948
- Peter Kiewit Sons' Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1947
- Ruff v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1942
- Virginia Engineering Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1944
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United Contractors, a Co-Partnership Consisting of James E. Ward, Elkin Morris and Andrew J. Dickies v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
- Travis T. Womack, Jr. And John R. Vorhies, Formerly Partners of Petroleum Ownership Map Company (A Dissolved Partnership) v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
- Morrison-Knudsen Company, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
- Timber Investors, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1978
- Troise v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990