Newell v. Brill
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial. M. T. Allen, Judge. ¡The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtGray, P. J.
The plaintiff had judgment herein foreclosing a mechanic’s lien, and the defendant appeals from the same and from an order denying him a new trial.
1. The contract of plaintiff’s assignors, Newell Bros., provided that the firm would do the gas-fitting and the plumbing in the building for $614. The complaint alleges that the Newell Bros, “agreed to do all of the work and furnish all materials necessary to complete the plumbing work in said building, according to the plans agreed upon between said parties,” for an agreed price of $614. The claim of lien recited that the work and materials…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Sidlinger v. KerkowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Madera Flume & Trading Co. v. KendallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Sachse v. AuburnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by1 opinion
- Olson-Mahoney Lumber Co. v. Dunne Investment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1916