Legal Opinion

Sachse v. Auburn

California Supreme Court

Decided August 18, 1892No. 18025PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtPaterson, J.

This is an action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. The case differs from Busy v. Prudom, ante, p. 646, this day filed, in one material respect only. There is neither an allegation nor a finding that all of the land which the decree directs to be sold is necessary for the convenient use and occupation of the building.

*651In Green v. Chandler, 54 Cal. 627,—the case upon which appellants rely, •— it appeared that the structure in controversy was built upon a tract of land containing something over eight acres. The court found that the whole of said parcel with its appurtenances was required for the…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Morgan's Louisiana & T. R. R. & S. S. Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1915
  2. Ward v. CraneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Newell v. BrillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API