Madera Flume & Trading Co. v. Kendall
California Supreme Court
APPEAL -from a judgment of the Superior Court of Madera County and from an order denying a new trial. W. M. Conley, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
Action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. The-appellant entered into a verbal contract with one Price for the ' construction of a building upon certain lands of which he was *183the owner, at an agreed price of seventeen hundred dollars. The respondent furnished certain materials which were used in the construction of the building, and within thirty days after its completion filed with the county recorder its claim of lien therefor. The present action is brought for the foreclosure of this lien. Price was made a defendant with the appellant, but appears to have made no defense to the action, and the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Santa Monica Lumber & Mill Co. v. HegeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- McMenomy v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Goss v. StrelitzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Phelps v. Maxwell's Creek Gold Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1874
- Wood v. WredeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
3Cited by8 opinions
- Christman v. SalwayOregon Supreme Court · 1922
- Peccole v. Luce & Goodfellow, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1949
- G. W. Jefferson & Bros. v. BryantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- Merced Lumber Co. v. BruschiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Hogan v. BiglerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.