Sidlinger v. Kerkow
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtPaterson, J.
This is an action to recover the sum. of $519 for work and labor upon a certain building owned by the defendant Amestoy in the city of Los Angeles. The amount claimed includes the sum of $300 as a balance under an express contract to perform certain work, the contract price being $600, and the sum of $219 for extra work, alleged to have been performed at the special instance ■ and request of the defendants Iverkow & Shurtz. The action is also to foreclose a mechanic’s lien for the sums mentioned. Plaintiff had judgment in the court below, and defendant has appealed therefrom on the judgment…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Tibbetts v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
3Cited by9 opinions
- Levy v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Kerckhoff-Cuzner Mill & Lumber Co. v. CummingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Delaware & Hudson R. Corporation v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942
- Christenson v. Cudahy Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1926
- Mason v. BullockAlabama Court of Appeals · 1912
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.