Legal Opinion

Richard Hellmann, Inc. v. Oakford & Fahnestock

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided January 4, 1932No. Patent Appeal 2805PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLAND, Associate Judge.

This is an appeal from the decision of the Commissioner of Patents, affirming the decision of the examiner of interferences in sustaining the opposition of appellee, wMch opposed the registration' by appellant of its trade-mark which comprises the notation “Richard Hellmann’s Blue Ribbon” placed under the representation of a blue ribbon bow and used for olive relish, tartar sauce, Thousand Island dressing, Russian dressing, and Southern relish or sandwich spread, consisting of mayonnaise with the addition of vegetables, herbs, and condiments.

The opposition is based on…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. California Packing Corporation v. Tillman & BendelCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
  2. American Fruit Growers, Inc. v. Michigan Fruit Growers, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
  3. Skookum Packers' Ass'n v. Pacific Northwest Canning Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
  4. National Biscuit Co. v. SheridanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
  5. Bean v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. John Morrell & Co. v. DoyleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1938
  2. Celanese Corp. v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
  3. Rockwood Chocolate Co., Inc. v. Hoffman Candy CompanyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
  4. Frankfort Distilleries, Inc. v. Kasko Distillers Products Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1940
  5. Skelly Oil Co. v. Powerine Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1936

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API