Legal Opinion
Celanese Corp. v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided March 4, 1946No. Patent Appeal 5066PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
O’CONNELL, Associate Judge.
This is an appeal from the decision of the Commissioner of Patents, speaking through the First Assistant Commissioner, 61 U. S. P. Q. 193, affirming the decision of the Examiner of Trade-Mark Interferences sustaining the opposition of appellee to the application of appellant filed June 19, 1942, for registration of the word “Clarifoil,” printed in capital letters, as a trade-mark for goods described in the application as “Transparent or Translucent Wrapping and Packing Material.” The application alleges use of the mark “since June 16, 1942.”
In its notice of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Menendez v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Schering & Glatz, Inc. v. Sharp & Dohme, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1944
- Skol Co. v. OlsonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1945
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1945
- Frankfort Distilleries, Inc. v. Kasko Distillers Products Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1940
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Amf Incorporated, a Corporation v. Sleekcraft Boats, a Sole Proprietorship, and Bruce E. Nescher, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- LaTouraine Coffee Co. v. Lorraine Coffee Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
- Ye Olde Tavern Cheese Products, Inc. v. Planters Peanuts Division, Standard Brands Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1966
- Goebel Brewing Co. v. Esslingers, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Telechron, Inc. v. Telicon Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1951
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.