Skelly Oil Co. v. Powerine Co.
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
BLAND, Associate Judge.
The appellant, hereinafter referred to-as “applicant,” filed its application with the United States Patent Office,' for the registration of ''its trade-mark “Power-max” for gasoline. The - appellee, hereinafter referred to as “opposer,” opposed the registration on the ground of its prior use and ownership of the trade-mark “Powerine” on identical goods.
The Examiner of Interferences dissected the marks, pointed out that the first two syllables of each of the marks was the term “Power” and the last syllables, were “ine” and “max,” respectively; that the differences in the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- California Packing Corporation v. Tillman & BendelCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
- B. F. Goodrich Co. v. HockmeyerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
- S. R. Feil Co. v. John E. Robbins Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1915
- National Biscuit Co. v. SheridanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
- Richard Hellmann, Inc. v. Oakford & FahnestockCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Johnston v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1947
- Speed Products Co., Inc. v. Tinnerman Products, IncCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- Skol Co. v. OlsonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1945
- Contour Chair-Lounge Co., Inc. v. The Englander Company, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
- Dubonnet Wine Corporation v. Ben-Burk, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1941
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.