Luckenbach v. Laer
California Supreme Court
APPEALS from orders of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County denying motions to vacate an order for the appointment of a receiver and authorizing him to institute suits. Charles S. Burnell, Judge. Appeals dismissed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtWaste, J.
Appellants are dissatisfied with certain orders, made after judgment, denying their motions to vacate and set aside previous orders of the trial court, also made after judgment, appointing a receiver and advising him to institute certain actions against them, after the judgment was returned unsatisfied. The appellants are Chris Krempel, Anna Krempel, Lucy ITauerwaas, and William H. Preston, not one of whom was a party to the action.
The plaintiff, Luckenbach, instituted an action against the defendants Laer, Trueblood, and the Krempel-Preston Company, a corporation, to recover an ordinary…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Title Ins. Trust Co. v. Calif. Etc. Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Elliott v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Baines v. BabcockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Adams v. WoodsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
- In Re Estate of McDermottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Greif v. DulleaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Aries Development Co. v. California Coastal Zone Conservation CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- In Re Michigan-Ohio Bldg. CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941
- Golden State Glass Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Grant v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.