Legal Opinion

Trudel v. Butori

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 15, 1912No. Civ. No. 982PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. M. T. Dooling, Judge presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.

This is an appeal by defendants from a judgment against them and from an order denying their motion for a new trial in an action brought by plaintiff against defendants for an alleged balance due for work done and labor furnished.

In January, 1907, defendants entered into a contract with W. Ottmann, in which contract Ottmann agreed to construct for defendants a certain building in San Francisco. With the consent and approval of defendants Ottmann assigned this contract to F. X. Trudel & Son, who at that time were engaged as copartners in the contracting business. At the request of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pendleton v. ClineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Guiterman v. WishonMontana Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Gray v. WellsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Vaughan v. KujathMontana Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Wilson v. Yegen Bros.Montana Supreme Court · 1909

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. AllenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
  2. Schwarz & Gottlieb, Inc. v. MarcuseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Lamberson v. BashoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  4. McFadden v. ShanleyArizona Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Pontiac Savings Bank v. Reinforced Concrete Pipe Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API