Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Yegen Bros.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1909No. 2,634PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Park County; Sydney Fox, Judge. Action by H. I. Wilson and others against Yegen Bros, and others. From an order granting a new trial, plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holloway

This action was brought by Wilson, Hinds, and Cook against the Park county free high school, a body corporate, to recover $852.09 for work done and materials furnished in constructing a concrete sidewalk about the high school grounds in Livingston. Thereafter the money was paid into court, and Yegen Bros, and Cothrin & Todd were substituted as defendants in the place of the Park county high school. The answer of Yegen Bros, is a general denial and an affirmative defense, to the effect that the work was done and materials furnished by Ben Hager, and *506not by the plaintiffs or any of them; that…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Carlock v. CagnacciCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Pendleton v. ClineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Guiterman v. WishonMontana Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Phillips v. GoldtreeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Doll v. Hennessy Mercantile Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1905

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. Garfield CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Piatt & Heath Co. v. WilmerMontana Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Decker Coal Co. v. Commonwealth Edison Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Harbolt v. HensenMontana Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Trudel v. ButoriCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API