Legal Opinion

Pontiac Savings Bank v. Reinforced Concrete Pipe Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1913No. Docket No. 60PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Case-made from Jackson; Parkinson, J. Assumpsit by the Pontiac Savings Bank against the Reinforced Concrete Pipe Company and others. Judgment for plaintiff on a directed verdict. Defendant brings case-made.

1Opinion of the CourtKuhn, J.

Suit was brought to recover the amount due upon a promissory note made by the defendant, the Reinforced Concrete Pipe Company, a corporation, to the Slater Construction Company, a copartnership, on the 8th day of August, 1912, for $3,600, due 30 days after date, with interest at 6 per cent. This note was received by the plaintiff August 10, 1912. It was a renewal of a note for the same amount dated July 9, 1912, due 30 days from date, and the last-mentioned note was a renewal of the original for the same sum, dated January 9, 1912, due in six months. This note was negotiated by the Slater…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cashin v. PliterMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Gray v. WellsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Trudel v. ButoriCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bottomley v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Lincoln Investment Co. v. MetrosMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Frazier v. LaffertyTennessee Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Peoples State Bank v. TromblyMichigan Supreme Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API