Gray v. Wells
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. James M. Troutt, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
BELCHER, C.
The plaintiff, as assignee of G. P. Gray and H. N. Gray, partners doing business in the city and county of *13San Francisco under the firm name of Gray Bros., brought this action to recover the sum of three hundred and sixty-four dollars and ninety-six cents alleged to be due and unpaid for work and labor performed and incidental materials furnished by said Gray Bros, to defendant at his special instance and request.
The answer denied the. alleged indebtedness, and as a separate defense alleged “that on or about the 6th of April, 1894, the firm of Gray Bros., mentioned in the amended…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Cheney v. J. R. Newberry & Co.California Supreme Court · 1885
- Wing Ho v. BaldwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
3Cited by11 opinions
- Breen v. CameronSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Schwarz & Gottlieb, Inc. v. MarcuseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Thorner v. Selective Cam Transmission Co.California Court of Appeal · 1960
- Trudel v. ButoriCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- McFadden v. ShanleyArizona Supreme Court · 1914
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.