Legal Opinion

Bennett v. CITY OF SALEM

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 26, 1951PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTooze, J.

This is a suit for an injunction, brought by Gardner Bennett, as plaintiff, against the city of Salem, a municipal corporation, and Carl Guenther, and Floyd L. Siegmund, water master, as defendants, and involves rights to the use of the waters of the North Santiam river in Marion and Linn counties, Oregon. The trial court entered a decree in favor of plaintiff and defendants appeal.

Plaintiff is the owner of a right to divert and use 812 c.f.s. (cubic feet per second) of water from the North Santiam river for power and manufacturing purposes with priority of 1866. He acquired this right from…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Oregon v. Portland Gen. Elec. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Bramwell v. RowlandOregon Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Barrett v. FailingOregon Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Yuen Suey v. FleshmanOregon Supreme Court · 1913
  5. In re Waters of Umatilla RiverOregon Supreme Court · 1917

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. York Et Ux v. StallingsOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Earls v. ClarkeOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Lyden v. GoldbergOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Bash v. Fir Grove Cemeteries, Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Day v. Advanced M & D Sales, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2004

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API