Citgo Petroleum Corp. v. United States Foreign Trade-Zones Board
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BRYSON, Circuit Judge.
Appellant Citgo Petroleum Corp. sought to have one of its oil refineries designated a “foreign-trade subzone” in order to obtain favorable treatment under the customs laws. The United States Foreign-Trade Zones Board approved the request subject to the condition that import duties be paid on for*399eign crude oil used as fuel in the refinery. The plaintiffs challenged the imposition of that condition, but the Court of International Trade upheld the Board’s action. We affirm.
I
Congress has authorized the creation of certain areas within the United States, known as…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Capital Cities Communications, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- Armco Steel Corp. v. StansCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- Nissan Motor Mfg. Corp., U.S.A. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- Conoco Inc. v. United States Foreign-Trade Zones BoardUnited States Court of International Trade · 1992
- Conoco, Inc. v. United States Foreign-Trade Zones BoardUnited States Court of International Trade · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- BMW Manufacturing Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1999
- Citgo Petroleum Corporation v. The United States Foreign Trade-Zones BoardCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996