Legal Opinion

Citgo Petroleum Corp. v. United States Foreign Trade-Zones Board

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided May 3, 1996No. 95-1390PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRYSON, Circuit Judge.

Appellant Citgo Petroleum Corp. sought to have one of its oil refineries designated a “foreign-trade subzone” in order to obtain favorable treatment under the customs laws. The United States Foreign-Trade Zones Board approved the request subject to the condition that import duties be paid on for*399eign crude oil used as fuel in the refinery. The plaintiffs challenged the imposition of that condition, but the Court of International Trade upheld the Board’s action. We affirm.

I

Congress has authorized the creation of certain areas within the United States, known as…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Capital Cities Communications, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
  2. Armco Steel Corp. v. StansCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
  3. Nissan Motor Mfg. Corp., U.S.A. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
  4. Conoco Inc. v. United States Foreign-Trade Zones BoardUnited States Court of International Trade · 1992
  5. Conoco, Inc. v. United States Foreign-Trade Zones BoardUnited States Court of International Trade · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. BMW Manufacturing Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1999
  2. Citgo Petroleum Corporation v. The United States Foreign Trade-Zones BoardCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API