Legal Opinion

Armco Steel Corp. v. Stans

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided August 17, 1970No. 671, Docket 34043PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WATERMAN, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiff-appellant, Armco Steel Corporation (Armco), a domestic producer of steel, challenges the legality of action taken by the Foreign-Trade Zones Board (Zones Board) in granting authorization to the Board of Commissioners of the Port of New Orleans (New Orleans Board) to establish in their port a foreign trade subzone. The initial purpose of this subzone grant was to premit in-tervenor-appellee Equitable Equipment Company, Inc. (Equitable), a shipbuilder, to construct with duty-free steel from Japan steel barge vessels at a shipyard located within the subzone.

Forei…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Norwegian Nitrogen Products Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  5. Power Reactor Development Co. v. International Union of Electrical, Radio & MacHine WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1961

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Ford Motor Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  2. Goodman Manufacturing, L.P. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  3. McDonald v. Stockton Metropolitan Transit DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  4. Ford Motor Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
  5. Conoco, Inc. v. United States Foreign-Trade Zones BoardUnited States Court of International Trade · 1994

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API