Armco Steel Corp. v. Stans
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WATERMAN, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiff-appellant, Armco Steel Corporation (Armco), a domestic producer of steel, challenges the legality of action taken by the Foreign-Trade Zones Board (Zones Board) in granting authorization to the Board of Commissioners of the Port of New Orleans (New Orleans Board) to establish in their port a foreign trade subzone. The initial purpose of this subzone grant was to premit in-tervenor-appellee Equitable Equipment Company, Inc. (Equitable), a shipbuilder, to construct with duty-free steel from Japan steel barge vessels at a shipyard located within the subzone.
Forei…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Norwegian Nitrogen Products Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Power Reactor Development Co. v. International Union of Electrical, Radio & MacHine WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Ford Motor Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Goodman Manufacturing, L.P. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- McDonald v. Stockton Metropolitan Transit DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Ford Motor Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Conoco, Inc. v. United States Foreign-Trade Zones BoardUnited States Court of International Trade · 1994
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.