Legal Opinion

BMW Manufacturing Corp. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided September 14, 1999No. 97-03-000396PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RESTANI, Judge.

This matter is before the court on cross-motions for summary judgment. Plaintiff seeks recovery of Harbor Maintenance Tax (“HMT”) 1 payments collected by the United States Customs Service on merchandise admitted into a foreign trade zone (“FTZ”) within the geographical territory of the United States.

I. Jurisdiction

In United States v. U.S. Shoe Corp., 523 U.S. 360, 118 S.Ct. 1290, 140 L.Ed.2d 453 (1998), the Supreme Court held that imposition of the HMT on exports violated the Export Clause of the Constitution. It also upheld jurisdiction over such challenges in this…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. Haggar Apparel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. United States v. United States Shoe Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Texport Oil Company, Plaintiff-Cross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
  5. Armco Steel Corp. v. StansCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bmw Manufacturing Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
  2. Citgo Petroleum Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000
  3. Aker Gulf Marine v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000
  4. Esso Standard Oil Co. (PR) v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API