Legal Opinion
Conoco, Inc. v. United States Foreign-Trade Zones Board
United States Court of International Trade
Decided June 30, 1994No. Court No. 90-06-00289. Slip Op. 94-105PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CARMAN, Judge:
Plaintiffs move for judgment upon the agency record pursuant to USCIT R. 56.1 to challenge certain conditions imposed by the United States Foreign-Trade Zones Board (FTZB or Board) upon the grants of foreign-trade subzones to plaintiffs Conoco, Inc. (Conoco) and Citgo Petroleum Corporation (Cit-go). Defendants cross-move for judgment upon the agency record. This Court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1581(i)(l), (4) (1988) and, for the reasons which follow, remands the action to the Board for further action consistent with this opinion.
I. Background
A. Procedure
Plaintiffs…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Conoco, Inc. v. United States Foreign-Trade Zones BoardUnited States Court of International Trade · 1995
- Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1996
- Miami Free Zone Corp. v. Foreign-Trade Zones BoardUnited States Court of International Trade · 1996
- Phibro Energy, Inc. v. BrownUnited States Court of International Trade · 1995
- Citgo Petroleum Corp. v. United States Foreign Trade-Zones BoardCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.