Legal Opinion
Conoco Inc. v. United States Foreign-Trade Zones Board
United States Court of International Trade
Decided April 7, 1992No. Court 90-06-00289PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
CARMAN, Judge:
Plaintiffs move for judgment upon the agency record pursuant to Rule 56.1 of the Rules of this Court. Defendants cross-move for judgment upon the agency record and preliminarily seek dismissal upon the grounds that this action fails to meet the prerequisites for subject-matter jurisdiction of this Court.
This action was commenced by Plaintiffs pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. § 701 et seq. (“APA”), seeking to overturn certain conditions imposed by the Foreign-Trade Zones (“FTZ”) Board upon the grants of foreign-trade subzones to Conoco, Inc.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Miller & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- K Mart Corp. v. Cartier, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- National Corn Growers Ass'n v. BakerCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Uniroyal, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Techsnabexport, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1992
- Miami Free Zone Corporation, Inc. v. Foreign Trade Zones Board, United States Department of Commerce, United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- Conoco, Inc. v. United States Foreign-Trade Zones BoardUnited States Court of International Trade · 1994
- Mitsubishi Electronics America, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1994
- Phibro Energy, Inc. v. FranklinUnited States Court of International Trade · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.