Legal Opinion

Ludwick v. This Minute of Carolina, Inc.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided August 21, 1984No. 0236PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sanders, Chief Judge:

Appellant Gwendolyn A. Ludwick sued respondents This Minute of Carolina, Inc., and its managers, Sheldon Solomon and Florence Solomon, alleging she was wrongfully discharged from her employment with the corporation. The trial judge ordered nonsuit at the close of Mrs. Ludwick’s case. We affirm.

I

Mrs. Ludwick first argues that the defense of failure to state a cause of action was waived because it was not raised in writing five days before trial. We reject this argument.

Section 15-13-370 of the 1976 Code of Laws of South Carolina states as follows:

Failure to take objection…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hubbard v. United Press International, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  2. Brockmeyer v. Dun & BradstreetWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Firestone Textile Co. Division v. MeadowsKentucky Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Ford v. HutsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  5. Todd v. South Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Shaw v. BurchfieldMississippi Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Ludwick v. This Minute of Carolina, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
  3. Richard L. v. ArmonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  4. Satterfield v. Lockheed Missiles & Space Co., Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1985
  5. M & T Chemicals, Inc. v. Barker Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API