Legal Opinion

Firestone Textile Co. Division v. Meadows

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 1983PublishedCited by 178 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEIBSON, Justice.

Tom Meadows was employed as a maintenance specialist at Firestone Textile Company in Bowling Green, Ky. He suffered a back injury and was off work for a substantial period of time. Thereafter, according to his testimony, he was first assigned light duty, then assigned duties beyond his capacity, and then terminated for seeking workers’ compensation benefits.

Meadows seeks damages alleging he was wrongfully discharged. The trial court held that if he was discharged in retaliation for seeking workers’ compensation benefits the discharge was wrongful, and submitted the question…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. International News Service v. Associated PressSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. Frampton v. Central Indiana Gas CompanyIndiana Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Brockmeyer v. Dun & BradstreetWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Pari-Mutuel Clerks' Union of Kentucky, Local 541, SEIU, AFL-CIO Ex Rel. Mann v. Kentucky Jockey ClubKentucky Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Scroghan v. Kraftco Corp.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by178 opinions

  1. Gantt v. Sentry InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Martin Marietta Corp. v. LorenzSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  3. Grzyb v. EvansKentucky Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Clanton v. Cain-Sloan Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Stringer v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2004

173 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API