Legal Opinion

Doe v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided December 10, 1996No. 95-616CPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

YOCK, Judge.

This contract action comes before the Court on the defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction or, in the alternative, failure to state a claim, under Rules 12(b)(1) and (4) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (RCFC). For the following reasons, the Court finds that it is without jurisdiction over this action.

Factual Background1

In this action, the plaintiff asserts that the Government breached an express or implied-in-fact contract to file a motion in the criminal case against the plaintiff to reduce his sentence pursuant to Fed.R.CrimJP.…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  4. Hercules, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Kania v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Edelmann v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  2. Stovall v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  3. Bailey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
  4. Sadeghi v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
  5. Carter v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API