Legal Opinion
Hivick v. Urschel
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 29, 1935No. 24501PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OSBORN, Y. C. J.
This action was filed in the d;strict court of Oklahoma county by L. C. Hivick, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, against C. F. Urschel, Arthur Seeligson, and Berenice Slick, as executors and trustees of the estate of Thomas B. Slick, deceased, hereinafter referred to as defendants, wherein plaintiff seeks to recover on a claim against the estate of T. B. Slick, deceased, in the sum of $44,800 arising through the, alleged breach of a contract between plaintiff and the deceased. The cause was tried to the court and a judgment rendered for defendants, from which plaintiff…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- National Bank v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Quinn v. PhippsSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
- Trice v. ComstockCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
- Moore v. CrawfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Hayden v. DannenbergSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Hammonds v. Aetna Casualty & Surety CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1965
- Oldland v. GrayCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
- Rees v. BriscoeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
- Simmons v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
- Kutz Canon Oil & Gas Co. v. HarrNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1952
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.