Legal Opinion
Harrington v. Spokane County
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided June 23, 2005No. 22837-1-IIIPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
¶1 Standing to seek judicial review of a land use decision generally requires the petitioner to exhaust all administrative remedies. The superior court dismissed this land use petition because, among other things, the landowner failed to exhaust his administrative remedies. We agree with that decision and affirm.
Sweeney, A.C.J.
FACTS
f2 This is a dispute between Alan Harrington doing business as Harrington Construction and Spokane County (County) over the conditional grant of a permit to build a residence on a lot adjoining a canal off Long Lake.
¶3 In 1989, developer Gary Correll, Mr.…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- McKart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Presbytery of Seattle v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- Amren v. City of KalamaWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Amren v. City of KalamaWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Crosby v. Spokane CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1999
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Nickum v. City of Bainbridge IslandCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- Nickum v. City of Bainbridge IslandCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- Buechler v. Wenatchee Valley CollegeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- Kailin v. Clallam CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- Kailin v. Clallam CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.