Presbytery of Seattle v. King County
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Andersen, J.—
Facts of Case
A well respected commentator on land use law, Professor Richard L. Settle of the University of Puget Sound Law School, recently wrote that "[rjegulatory taking doctrine is the most perplexing area of American land use law." By our opinion herein, we deal with that subject, elaborate upon our opinion in Orion Corp. v. State, 109 Wn.2d 621, 747 P.2d 1062 (1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1022, 100 L. Ed. 2d 227, 108 S. Ct. 1996 (1988), and clarify this court's recent opinion in Allingham v. Seattle, 109 Wn.2d 947, 749 P.2d 160 (1988).
In this case, the owner of property…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by145 opinions
- Robinson v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Sintra, Inc. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Lutheran Day Care v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Weden v. San Juan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Weden v. San Juan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
140 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.