Lessenberry v. Little Rock-Pulaski Drainage District No. 2
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Grieein Smith, Chief Justice.
The appeal is from a judgment of Circuit Court overruling protests of landowners that benefit assessments in the Drainage District were invalid because the method of assessing was unfair, arbitrary, and discriminatory. It is also insisted that the complaining parties were hampered in efforts to develop their case because of the Court’s refusal to compel pro-
2 chiction of data upon which damages for taking land for right-of-way purposes were based.
Appellants’ description of the District is that the western boundary is the Missouri Pacific-Rock Island railroads in…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Fallbrook Irrigation District v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Norwood v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Carson v. St. Francis Levee DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1894
- Kirst v. Street Improvement District No. 120Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Burris v. City of Little RockCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- Burris v. City Of Little RockCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- Pendleton v. Stuttgart & King's Bayou Drainage & Irrigation Dist. No. 1Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1962
- Harris v. BlackburnSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
- Caldarera v. Little Rock-Pulaski Drainage District No. 2Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1949