Legal Opinion

Pendleton v. Stuttgart & King's Bayou Drainage & Irrigation Dist. No. 1

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 8, 1962No. 5-2684PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sam Robinson, Associate Justice.

During 1911 there were created in Arkansas County two drainage districts —King’s Bayou Drainage District and Wulff Drainage District; Wulff Bayou drains into King’s Bayou. The districts are contiguous and extend from the City of Stuttgart to some 12 miles south. The districts accomplished the intended purposes and for a long time have been inactive and dormant; no drainage taxes having been levied for many years. No work has been done in either district since 1935; however, neither district has been formally dissolved.

In 1959 a new district, to be known as the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Carson v. St. Francis Levee DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1894
  2. Lee Wilson & Co. v. William R. Compton Bond & Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  3. Memphis Land & Timber Co. v. St. Francis Levee DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1897
  4. Sembler v. Water & Light Improvement DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
  5. Mahan v. WilsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mayberry Drainage District v. GrahamSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  2. Balloun v. ArcherSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API