Legal Opinion

Caldarera v. Little Rock-Pulaski Drainage District No. 2

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 25, 1949No. 4-8863Published

1Opinion of the CourtRobins, J.

Appellants own land situated in appellee, -Little Bock-Pulaski Drainage District No. 2 of Pulasld County, organized for the purpose of protecting, by levee and drainage works, lowlands in the eastern part of the City of Little Bock and suburban territory adjacent. This district was created under authority of Act No. 279, approved May 27, 1909, and Acts supplemental and amendatory; and certain phases of the procedure to organize it were before us in the case of Lessenberry v. Little Rock-Pulaski Drainage District Number 2, 211 Ark. 1046, 204 S. W. 2d 554.

A portion of appellants’ land being…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dickerson v. Tri-County Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
  2. Sain v. Cypress Creek Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
  3. Lessenberry v. Little Rock-Pulaski Drainage District No. 2Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
  4. Summers v. Conway & Damascus Road Improvement DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
  5. Kelleher v. Subsidiary Drnge. 11 of St. FrancisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API