Legal Opinion

State v. Mierz

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 24, 1995No. 61930-1PublishedCited by 133 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTalmadge, J.

The present case arises out of John Paul Mierz’s unlawful possession of two coyotes and his assault upon Department of Wildlife agents (Wildlife agents) who entered his yard without a warrant to seize the coyotes. On rather convoluted facts, we must decide a number of issues, but the most preying is whether a person confronted with allegedly unreasonable search or seizure may assault law enforcement officers and then rely on the exclusionary rule to foreclose admission of evidence pertaining to the assaultive behavior. Because exclusion of the evidence of violent behavior would only license…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Marshall v. Barlow's, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. United States v. DunnSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by133 opinions

  1. State v. HendricksonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. HendricksonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  3. In re the Personal Restraint GentryWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  4. In Re Personal Restraint of GentryWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. DrumWashington Supreme Court · 2010

128 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API