Taylor v. Taylor
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
PARKER, Judge.
By appropriate assignments of error based on exceptions duly noted, defendant challenges certain of the court’s crucial findings of fact as being unsupported by the evidence and challenges in turn all of the court’s conclusions of law as being unsupported by the factual findings. Although a number of these assignments of error have merit, we find it unnecessary to pass upon them seriatim. We find the judgment itself, when viewed in the light of all of the evidence, so affected by errors of law that it must be vacated.
G.S. 50-16.1(1) defines “alimony” for purposes of G.S. Ch. 50…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Hudson v. HudsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Beall v. BeallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Schloss v. SchlossSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Taylor v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
3Cited by2 opinions
- Stickel v. StickelCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- Whitesell v. WhitesellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982