Legal Opinion
Taylor v. Taylor
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided July 16, 1975No. 755DC221PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VAUGHN, Judge.
We need not refer to the evidence. The judgment awarding alimony is, on its face, so affected by errors of law that it must be vacated.
G.S. 50-16.7, in pertinent part, is as follows:
“How alimony and alimony pendente lite paid; enforcement of decree.— (a) Alimony or alimony pendente lite shall be paid by lump sum payment, periodic payments, or by transfer of title or possession of personal property or any interest therein, or a security interest in or possession of real property, as the court may order.”
This section does not authorize the court to direct that alimony be paid by…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Eggleston v. . EgglestonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- Sayland Ex Rel. McLendon v. SaylandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Schloss v. SchlossSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
3Cited by5 opinions
- Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Britt v. BrittSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1978
- Clark v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Taylor v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Gilbert v. GilbertCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984