Legal Opinion

Haskins v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided March 13, 2002No. 00-272-CPublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

HEWITT, Judge.

This is a suit by a discharged veteran to obtain disability retirement pay. Disability retirement pay is available if a service member receives a physical disability rating of 30 percent disability or greater. Plaintiff contends that the Army’s assignment of a 20 percent physical disability rating and severance pay was improper, and that he should have received a physical disability rating of at least 30 percent and should have been given a medical retirement with full disability pay. Defendant disputes this court’s jurisdiction to hear this case and contends…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Fisher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  2. Stine v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  3. Frank E. Fisher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
  4. Jeun v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  5. Captain Ross E. Joslyn v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API