Marquardt Co. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
HEWITT, Chief Judge.
Befox-e the eoux-t are Defendant’s Motion for Summax-y Judgment and Suppox-ting Memorandum of Law (Def.’s Mot.), Docket Number (Dkt. No.) 28, filed May 16, 2011; Defendant’s Proposed Findings of Uncontro-vex-ted Fact (DFUF), Dkt. No. 29, filed May 16, 2011; The Max-quardt Company’s Opposition to the Govei-nment’s Motion for Sum-max-y Judgment (Pl.’s Resp.), Dkt. No. 30, *267filed June 15, 2011; Plaintiffs Response to Defendant’s Proposed Findings of Uncontro-verted Fact (PL’s Resp. to DFUF), Dkt. No. 31, filed June 15, 2011; Defendant’s Reply to Plaintiffs…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- GULF GROUP GENERAL ENTERPRISES CO. W.L.L., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, DefendantUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Seven Resorts, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Stathis v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Oasis International Waters, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Allen v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.