Legal Opinion
Peerless Products, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided November 30, 1960No. 13034PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HASTINGS, Chief Judge.
This is a petition to review and set aside an order of respondent Federal Trade Commission requiring petitioners Peerless Products, Inc., a corporation, and Shirley Maltz, as an officer of Peerless, and Marshall Maltz, individually and as an officer of Peerless,1 to cease and desist from “[s]elling or distributing in commerce * * * punchboards or other devices which are designed or intended to be used in the sale or distribution of merchandise to the public by means of a game of chance, gift enterprise or lottery spheme.” Such order was issued at the conclusion of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lichtenstein v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
- Surf Sales Company v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1958
- Max H. Goldberg, Trading Under the Name of Novel Company v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1960
- R. B. James and Patrick Zurla, Individuals and Co-Partners, Trading as Chicago Board Company v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1958
- Royal Oil Corporation v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1959
3Cited by4 opinions
- Nate Gellman, Burt Horwitz and Peter Podany, Individually and as Co-Partners Doing Business as Gellman Brothers v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961
- Dandy Products, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1964
- Dandy Products, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1964
- Peerless Products, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1960