Legal Opinion

Peerless Products, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided December 29, 1960No. 13034Published

1Opinion of the Court

284 F.2d 825

PEERLESS PRODUCTS, INC., a corporation and Marshall Maltz, Rose Maltz and Shirley Maltz, individually and as officers of said corporation, Petitioners,

v.

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Respondent.

No. 13034.

United States Court of Appeals Seventh Circuit.

November 30, 1960.

Rehearing Denied December 29, 1960.

Simon Herr, Chicago, Ill., for petitioners.

Alan B. Hobbes, Asst. Gen. Counsel, James McI. Henderson, Atty., Daniel J. McCauley, Jr., Gen. Counsel, Jno. W. Carter, Jr., Atty., Federal Trade Commission, Washington, D. C., for respondent.

Before HASTINGS, Chief Judge, and DUFFY and MAJOR,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lichtenstein v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
  2. Surf Sales Company v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1958
  3. Max H. Goldberg, Trading Under the Name of Novel Company v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1960
  4. R. B. James and Patrick Zurla, Individuals and Co-Partners, Trading as Chicago Board Company v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1958
  5. Peerless Products, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API