Legal Opinion
Lichtenstein v. Federal Trade Commission
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 27, 1952No. 12666_1PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DENMAN, Chief Judge.
Petitioner, a dealer in gambling devices used to promote sales of merchandise, seeks a review and our setting aside of two orders of the Federal Trade Commission. One of the orders provides:
“It is further ordered that said respondents and their agents, representatives and employees, directly or through any corporate or other device, in connection with the offering for sale, sale or distribution in commerce, as ‘commerce’ is defined in the Federal Trade Commission Act, of cigarette chests or boxes, or other articles of merchandise, do forthwith cease and desist from:
“1.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Fashion Originators' Guild of America, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Federal Trade Commission v. Raladam Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Federal Trade Commission v. R. F. Keppel & Bro. Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Federal Trade Commission v. Raladam Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Phalen v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Marco Sales Company, a Corporation, and Marvin O. Baer, Individually and as an Officer of Said Corporation v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
- Pinney & Topliff v. Chrysler CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1959
- Surf Sales Company v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1958
- Zitserman v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1952
- Gay Games, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1953
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.