Legal Opinion

Royal Oil Corporation v. Federal Trade Commission

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided January 5, 1959No. 7693_1PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

262 F.2d 741

ROYAL OIL CORPORATION, a corporation, and Alden C. Jocelyn

and Joseph A. Inciardi, individually and as

officers of Royal Oil Corporation, Petitioners,

v.

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Respondent.

No. 7693.

United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.

Argued Oct. 16, 1958.

Decided Jan. 5, 1959.

Joseph S. Kaufman and Harry D. Kaufman, Baltimore, Md., for petitioners.

E. K. Elkins, Atty., Federal Trade Commission, Washington, D.C. (Earl W. Kintner, Gen. Counsel, and James E. Corkey, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Federal Trade Commission, Washington, D.C., on brief), for respondent.

Before SOBELOFF, Chief…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Federal Trade Commission v. Bunte Bros.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Federal Trade Commission v. National Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Chamber of Commerce of Minneapolis v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
  5. E. F. Drew & Co., Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Simeon Management Corporation v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  2. Peerless Products, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1960
  3. Peerless Products, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API