Legal Opinion
Dandy Products, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided June 11, 1964No. 14320PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KILEY, Circuit Judge.
The question is whether the Federal Trade Commission’s order that Dandy Products, Inc. and Joseph Gron, individually and as an officer of Dandy, cease and desist from using lottery devices or games of chance in sale or. distribution of merchandise should be set aside because of a change in the “moral” climate of the business community. We think the order should stand.
Petitioners’ briefs do not challenge, as they could not successfully do, the finding that the punchboard device used was a lottery device, or game of chance. Federal Trade Commission v. R. F. Keppel & Bro.,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Federal Trade Commission v. R. F. Keppel & Bro. Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Modernistic Candies, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1944
- Lichtenstein v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
- Surf Sales Company v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1958
- Max H. Goldberg, Trading Under the Name of Novel Company v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1960
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bear Sales Company, a Corporation and E. Robert Baer, Individually and as as an Officer of Said Corporation v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1966
- Dandy Products, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1964