Legal Opinion

Amos Flight Operations, Inc. v. Thunderbird Bank

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided September 25, 1975No. 11710PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMERON, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered in favor of Thunderbird Bank, appellee. Jurisdiction is taken pursuant to Rule 47(e)(5) of the Rules of the Supreme Court.

We must answer the following matters on appeal:

1. Did the bank have a right to rescind the $150,000 time certificate of deposit ?

2. Was the bank damaged and therefore entitled to judgment against the plaintiffs on the counterclaim ?

3. Was the bank entitled to attorney’s fees?

The following facts are necessary for a determination of the matter on appeal. Amos Flight Operations, Inc., Donald L. Amos and Howard…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hammaker v. SchleighCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1929
  2. Steele v. VandersliceArizona Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Mahurin v. SchmeckArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Fish v. Valley Nat. Bank of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Wilmington Trust Company v. Delaware Auto SalesSupreme Court of Delaware · 1970

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Gamble v. Northstore PartnershipAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Renner v. KehlArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Gressley v. Patterson Tillage & Leveling Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
  4. Great Western Bank & Trust Co. v. Pima Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
  5. Nemec v. RolloCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API