Legal Opinion

Fish v. Valley Nat. Bank of Phoenix

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 1946No. 4758PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORGAN, Judge.

This action was instituted by H. D. Lore, trustee, doing business as Lakeside Light & Power Company, against the defendants who appear here as appellants. During the pendency of the appeal, Lore died, and his executor, Valley National Bank of Phoenix has been substituted as appellee. R. S. Lewis is merely a nominal party. Minnie A. Fish is a party by reason of her marital relationship. For convenience the parties will be styled as plaintiff and defendant.

The facts may be stated briefly as follows: During the year 1938 plaintiff was engaged in the business of buying and selling…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hammock v. Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Fechet v. DrakeArizona Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Rothenberg v. Franklin Washington Trust Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1940
  4. Pike v. Camden Trust Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1940
  5. Clearwater County State Bank v. Bagley-Ogema Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Jennings v. LeeArizona Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Mahurin v. SchmeckArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Wilson v. WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  4. ABCDW LLC v. BanningCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
  5. Gomez v. DykesArizona Supreme Court · 1961

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API