Legal Opinion

Nemec v. Rollo

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 17, 1977No. 1 CA-CIV 3135PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NELSON, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiffs, Richard and Barbara Nemec, commenced an action against the defendant, Martin Rollo, to recover the unpaid balance of Rollo’s personal note, given as part of the purchase price for the sale of real property. Plaintiffs now appeal from the dismissal of their action in response to defendant’s motion for summary judgment. For the reasons stated below, we affirm the judgment.

In 1974 defendant and plaintiffs entered into a written agreement for the sale of real property located in the City of Phoenix. The purchase price was $510,000.00 and was payable as follows:…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Davies v. BoydNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Weatherford v. AdamsArizona Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Carrillo v. TaylorArizona Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Choisser v. State Ex Rel. HermanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
  5. Glassell v. ColemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Cullison v. City of PeoriaArizona Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Northern Contracting Co. v. Allis-Chalmers Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Melinda S. Workman v. Verde Wellness Center, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
  4. Southwest Savings & Loan Ass'n v. LudiArizona Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Matter of Estate of KerrCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API