Farmers' & Merchants' Bank v. Bank of Glen Elder
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from, Mitchell District Court. Replevin. The opinion states the facts. Judgment for the plaintiff, Bank of Glen Elder, at the September term, 1888. The defendant, Farmers’ &c. Bank, brings the case to this court.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Horton, C. J.:
Replevin for a horse and a cow, of the value of $70, brought originally before a justice of the peace by the Bank of Glen Elder against the Farmers’ and Merchants’ Bank of Cawker City. An appeal was taken to the district court. In that court the plaintiff below was permitted to amend its bill of particulars twice. To the last amended bill of particulars, or petition, the defendant below filed a general denial. Upon the trial, at the close of the plaintiff’s evidence, the defendant filed a demurrer for the reason that it failed to prove a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Raper v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
- Howard v. First National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1890
- First National Bank v. TappanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1870
- Stith v. FullinwiderSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
- Cook v. Ottawa UniversitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1875
3Cited by15 opinions
- Russell v. American Rock Crusher Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1957
- Boone v. Citizens Bank & Trust Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1927
- Goldstein v. Peter Fox Sons Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
- Bowles v. Marx Hide & Tallow Co.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1945
- Blue Ridge Electric Membership Corp. v. Grannis Bros.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.