Howard v. First National Bank
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from, Haney District Court. Trover. The opinion contains a sufficient statement of the case.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Strang, C.:
Action for damages, for the conversion of certain sheep, begun by the plaintiff below in the *550district court of Harvey county, February 18,1886. Plaintiff’s right to recover was based upon a chattel mortgage covering the sheep, and which had become absolute, and an unsuccessful demand of the defendants below for the possession of said sheep. The defendants answered: 1st, general denial; 2d, possession of the sheep under other and prior mortgages, and 3d, an agister’s lieu. To which plaintiff replied : 1st, general denial; 2d, want of consideration and fraud in the mortgage…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Gregory v. ThomasNew York Supreme Court · 1838
- Grove v. City of KansasSupreme Court of Missouri · 1882
- Meech v. . PatchinNew York Court of Appeals · 1856
- Packard v. KingmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1860
- Lowe v. WingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Fourth National Bank v. HillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
- Polk County Bank v. SpitzMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
- Pacific National Agricultural Credit Corp. v. WilburCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Morgan v. Stanton Auto Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Farmers' & Merchants' Bank v. Bank of Glen ElderSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.