Goldstein v. Peter Fox Sons Co.
North Dakota Supreme Court
An appeal from an order of tbe District Court of Richland county ■denying defendant’s application to vacate the judgment entered and dismiss the action for want of jurisdiction; Allen, J.
1Opinion of the CourtGoss, J.
The summons and complaint were issued November 6, 1908, with an attachment, in an action by these plaintiffs against the defendant company, designated as the Peter Fox Sons Company, a corporation, instead of against a copartnership with members named as-*638now entitled. A car of poultry was attached November 9th, and personal service of summons, complaint, warrant of attachment, and notice-of levy was then made at Hankinson upon Anthony Fox, one of the co-partners. The defendant company was named as a corporation, and service upon it was attempted to be made by such personal service upon Anthony…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Bassett v. . FishNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- New York State Monitor Milk Pan Ass'n v. Remington Agricultural WorksNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Plemmons v. Southern Improvement Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
- White v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1895
- Stowers Furniture Co. v. BrakeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- World Fire & Marine Insurance v. Alliance Sandblasting Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
- Duncan v. Smith Brothers Grain Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1924
- Bowles v. Marx Hide & Tallow Co.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1945
- Blue Ridge Electric Membership Corp. v. Grannis Bros.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- N. A. Kennedy Butter Tub Co. v. First & Hamilton National Bank of Fort WayneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.